Arabic Literature

Abstract Linguistic processes are always involved in creating a kind of narrative of the world in order to create discourse categories with views based on worldview. Linguistic processes of confrontation and synonymy play an important and effective role in shaping the worldview of texts. Leslie Jeffries (2010) is one of the few linguistics researchers who has drawn a model for gaining insight into the potential worldview impact of texts by recognizing textual contrasts and synonyms and how to regulate this textual phenomenon alongside the more established tools of critical discourse analysis. The types of negative, transitive, superlative, displacement, privileged, explicit, parallel, and comparison contrasts, as well as relational, expressive, and metaphorical synonyms are the components suggested by Jeffries in order to discover the hidden ideology of the text. This research has been done with the method of critical stylistics and with the aim of explaining the contradictions and ideological synonyms in the speeches of the Secretary General of Hezbollah of Lebanon, Seyed Hassan Nasrallah, which was made on the occasion of the Al-Aqsa storm operation, based on the point of view of Leslie Jeffries. The result of the research indicates that the examination of conceptual relationships in the textual structure of contrasts and synonyms of Nasrallah's words is aimed at presenting worldview categories.

. Also, synonyms seek to shape the common worldview of the society in the fight against the occupying regime.

The estimation of the weak presence of metaphorical confrontations is indicative of the frankness of the speech in order to quickly receive the audience from the lower layers of the text and the active presence of negative confrontations in the wake of negating or marginalizing the legitimacy of the Zionist system in the minds of the world community.

Abstract Discourse, as an efficient linguistic process, is one of the most widely used tools used by the domination system to achieve social-political goals, whether in the form of speech or writing. Critical discourse analysis is a systematic approach to study how to use this process. Hodge and Kress are among the linguists who, relying on this principle, presented a linguistic and methodical model, consisting of four components: naming, nominalization, unknown vs. known, and action sentences vs. documents. Are   This research is descriptive-analytical with the aim of explaining the ideological orientations governing the text in the novel The Second Dog War It has investigated the process of discourse structures based on this theory. The result of the research indicates that the author has explained his ideologies in the face of the domination system, the capitalist rule and the socio-political conditions of Palestine with the use of language and discourse orientations in the linguistic context of the novel. The new form of dealing with the issues of Palestine and the discourse structure of the mentioned novel depicts a society that, in the pleasurable and lustful encounter with the dreams of modernity, still places its value and freedom in the occupation of aliens, and finally, with the spread of human simulation, it leads the world to the abyss of destruction. The destruction of the ideal city of these social activists is the result of their destructive speech, which is manifested in small behaviors and small speeches, and is considered one of the effects of linguistic functions on literary texts