A Study of the Semantic Process in the Story of Dhul-Qarnayn in the Quran

Siavashi, Sabereh

doi:10.22059/jalit.2019.257510.611902

A Study of the Semantic Process in the Story of Dhul-Qarnayn in the Quran

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

sabereh siavashi

Assistant Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies

https://doi.org/10.22059/jalit.2019.257510.611902

Abstract

Storytelling is one of the important and practical tactics employed in the Koran to convey meanings and concepts. The present article adopts discourse semio-semantics, which is considered as a new approach and which provides the possibility of systematic analysis and evaluation of texts, to make a contribution to this process of conveying Koranic meanings and terms. The story of Dhul-Qarnayn in the Koran, an important didactic story which depicts one of the important idols who played a role in humanity’s world, has the potential to be studied from a semio-semantic perspective. The Koran introduces Dhul-Qarnayn by describing his three journeys. There are sixteen verses in the eighteenth chapter (sūrat) of the Koran, i.e. “The Cave” (Al-Kahf), about his personality and actions. Therefore, the writer seeks to discover the discourse process governing this story in order to provide a plan for the process of production of and formulating meaning in the story. The findings suggest that the dominant discourse of the story, especially in his third journey which is made to build a dam, is action-based. Action function has an important role in the narrative process of the story and action atmosphere controls the process of meaning production. Activists, by gaining power during an action process, are released from meaning crisis and go from the negative status of disconnection from security to the positive status of connection to security. Moreover during this process they succeed in taking over the value object which they had lost due to an external force. Furthermore, Dhul-Qarnayn’s all three journeys are driven by his superego since they are made to the farthest places in order to create a space to take humanity to perfection. This behavior originates from his monotheistic view, which is his fundamental belief and is rooted in his essence, and conveys the ethic process to the reader.

Keywords

semio

semantics

discourse system

action

discourse

References:

Holy Quran.

Aayati, A. & Akbari, N. (2016) “Semiotic Analysis of Jealousy in Sadegh Hedayat’s “Forgiveness”. Language Related Research. Vol.7. No.2. Pp. 1-17. [In Persian].

Atashsowda, M. A & Nekoei, R. (2017). “Narratology of the Short Story "Elegy for Jaleh and Her Murderer" Based on Greimas’ Actantial and Sensible/ Stative Models” Short Story. Language Related Research. Vol. 8. No. 4. Pp. 175-206. [In Persian].

Abbasi, A. & Yarmand, H. (2011). “Transition from the semiotic square to tensive square: the case study of “Mahi Siahe Kochoulou”. Language Related Research. Vol. 7. Pp. 147-172. [In Persian].

Akbarizade, F. & Mohasses, M. (2017). “Semiotic Study of Moses’ Missionary Discourse in Quran”. Language Related Research. Vol.8. No.5. Pp. 293-318. [In Persian].

Ashrafi, B. & Taki, G. & Behnamfar, M. (2015). “The Analysis of Joseph Story in The Quran according to Propp's and Greimas' Approaches”. Language Related Research. Vol.6. No.7. Pp. 33-52. [In Persian].

Davoudi Moghadam, F. (2014). “Analysis of Semiotics Discourse in the Story of Prophet Joseph”. Qur'anic Teachings. No. 20. Pp: 175-192. [In Persian].

Emadzadeh, H. (2004). History of the prophets. Tehran: Islam Publication. [In Persian].

Haghbin, F. & Bidadian Qomi, F. (2013). “Semiotic study of the Verses Qiyamat and Ma’adin Surah Qiyamat; Based on Greimas Semiotic Studies”. Language Studies. Vol.4, No. 2. Pp. 51-74. [In Persian].

Heidari Kashani, M. J. (2006). “The art of storytelling in Qur'an”, Papers of First National Conference of Qur'anic Studies in Hawzah & University. Isfahan: Isfahan University Press. [In Persian].

Ismaeli, E.; H.R. Shairi & I. Kanani (2012). “A semiotic approach to Daghughi Tale of Mathnavi: from semiotic square to tensive square”. Researches on Mystical literature. Vol. 23. Pp. 69-94. [In Persian].

Makarem Shirazi, N. (2002). Tafsir Nemooneh. Tehran: Islamic Book Publication. [In Persian].

Nasihat, N.& Roshanfekr, K.& Parvini, Kh. & Mirzaee, F. (2013). “The survey of narrative semiotics of semantic structure in “Leqa-on fi Lazate Rahil” Short Story. Language Related Research. Vol. 4. No. 2. (Tome 14). Pp. 199-220. [In Persian].

Pakatchi, A.; H. R. Shairi & H. Rahnamaa (2015). “Tensive semiotics of discourse in Surat Al- Qariah; A New approach in semiotics of the Quranic discourse”. Language Related Research. Vol.6. No.4. Pp. 39- 68. [In Persian].

Qaraati, M. (2009). Tafsir Noor. Tehran: Lessons of Quran Press. [In Persian].

Seaadat Mostafavi, S. H.; H. R. Shairi & H. Rahnama (2013). “Tensive Semiotics of "Kiramat" (dignity) in the Quranic Discourse”. In Journal of Qur'anic Interpretation and Language. Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp 24- 42. [In Persian].

Seyedan, E. (2016). “Investigating the role of discontinuity and continuity in discoursal syntagm of Hafiz lyrics: semiotic approach”. Language Related Research Tarbiat Modares University. No. 4 (7). Pp. 195-216. [In Persian].

Shairi, H. R. (2006). Analysis of Semiotics of Discourse. Tehran: Samt Publication. [In Persian].

Shairi, H. R. (2015). “Discourse Resistance, Insistence and Appeasement: the Realms of Discourse and its Semiotic Functions” Iranian Sociological Association, Vol.16. No.1. Pp: 110-128. [In Persian].

Shairi, H. R. (2009). “From structuralism semiology to semiotics of discourse”. Literary criticism. Year 2. No.3. Pp. 33-51. [In Persian].

Shairi, H. R. (2009). Prerequisites of the New Semiotics. Tehran: Samt Publication. [In Persian].

Shairi, H. R. (2016). Semiotics of Literature. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University Press. [In Persian].

Shairi, H. & T. Vafaei (2010). A Path to the Dynamic Semiotics, a Case Study on the Nima's Poem: Qoqnous. Tehran: `Elmi va Farhangui Publication. [In Persian].

Sharifi, H. & Najmoddin, F. (2014). “The Semiotics Analysis of Sura al-Rahman (based on Fontanille Tensive Model)”. Journal of Qur'anic Interpretation and Language. Vol. 3. No.1. Pp: 47- 72. [In Persian].

Tabatabaei, S. M. H. (1992). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an.Tehran: Raja Publication. [In Persian].

Websites:

Makarem Shirazi, N. (2001). Sample Commentary. Vol 12, Tehran: Noor Digital Library.

http://www.noorlib.ir