Zineh Erfatpour
Abstract
In Contemporary semiotics, if there are such names as Propp, Grimas, Todorov, Genet, and Barthes in the field of narratological studies, Michael Riffattere should be considered one ...
Read More
In Contemporary semiotics, if there are such names as Propp, Grimas, Todorov, Genet, and Barthes in the field of narratological studies, Michael Riffattere should be considered one of the methodical theorists in the field of poetry. In the course of his ideas and theories, turns from Riffaterre "structural stylistics" to the semiotics of poetry and text production, and in this regard, he presents the signs and elements that create the literature of poetic text. In Riffaterre theory, there are two ways of reading: exploratory or linear reading and semiotic or retrospective reading which the reader, after examining the elements of text literature, namely inaccuracies, descriptive systems, accumulations (synonyms) and hypograms (the stereotyped image that is induced in the mind of the reader through the whole poem), achieves the matrix or network of poetry, which is the basic proposition of the poem and provides means of unity. In this article, after exploratory and semiotic reading of the ode of sorrow, we came to the conclusion that the semiotic elements based on Riffaterre's point of view can play a good role in reading the semiotic level of the ode of sorrow Abdel-Saboor; The poem's mourning has few instructions in terms of vocabulary and syntax, but in terms of meaning it has many instructions that show themselves through simile, metaphor and irony. On the other hand, descriptive systems, accumulations, hypograms, and finally text matrices all together illustrate the key themes of poetry and achieve poetic unity
