Arabic Literature

Criticue: The Pluralism and Dialect of Authenticity and Modernity in Arab Thought

Saadollah Homaiuni; Adnan Tahmasbi

Volume 11, Issue 1 , July 2019, , Pages 265-282

https://doi.org/10.22059/jalit.2019.279300.612053

Abstract

Pluralism is rooted in the long history of Arab thought, as in the Abbasid era, to the extent that its consequences were manifested in the emergence of contradictory ideas, parties ... Read More Pluralism is rooted in the long history of Arab thought, as in the Abbasid era, to the extent that its consequences were manifested in the emergence of contradictory ideas, parties and personalities engaging with one another in order to attain power by exploiting religion and ethnicity. Contractions that often did not have any rational logic beyond them but only to achieve power. In this way, we sometimes see the emergence of intellectual and sometimes reactionary thoughts. The dialectic was conducted in a narrow worldview focused on "self" and the commemoration of "me" and the "other" rejection in a closed loop. A discourse that was fueled by power struggles, religious and ethnic affiliations, the rise of tribal strife and, ultimately, civil wars. But in the contemporary era, the link between thought and civilization and science provided the basis for using the intellectual achievements of the world for Arab thought to establish a rational link between tradition and modernity in the Arab world. Just as the atmosphere of an open contemporary discourse, in line with the new needs, provided the ground for emancipation from the absurd thoughts and long-suffering ideas that had long been shadowed by the collective thought of the Arabs. Though today, this idea is facing obstacles and challenges, it is in line with modernity and its positive and negative consequences. So its manifestations can be seen in the thoughts of the intellectuals of the Arab world in many countries and undoubtedly its implications in the social sphere of the Arab world will be reflected and found, so that the Arab Spring can be considered part of the intellectual outcomes in the Arab world. The present article seeks to use the descriptive-analytical method of contemporary Arab thought and how the emancipation of such scholars as Aedounis, Mostafa Hejazi, Hassan Hanafi and others from the fatalistic self-centeredness of their era, which had destroyed all the modernist effects of the past.

Contrastive Analysis – Semantics of Sentence System

Sa&rsquo;adollah Homaiuni; hoda yazdan

Volume 9, Issue 2 , March 2018, , Pages 73-91

https://doi.org/10.22059/jalit.2018.244632.611809

Abstract

The contrastive analysis of languages is one the most important for recognizing the coherent templates to train vocabularies, grammar, semantics and pragmatics in different levels. ... Read More

Cognitive and Metacognitive Factors in the Process of Learning Arabic Conversation through Desuggestopeida Method

Adnan Tahmasebi; Sa’adollah Homaiuni

Volume 7, Issue 2 , July 2016, , Pages 159-178

https://doi.org/10.22059/jalit.2016.58097

Abstract

Arabic language instruction in Iran has always relied on cognitive factors, and has been based on grammar-translation method. Consequently, issues such as Arabic learner's and teacher's ... Read More

Articles in Press

Current Issue

Volume 16 (2024)

Volume 15 (2023)

Volume 14 (2022)

Volume 13 (2021)

Volume 12 (2020)

Volume 11 (2019)

Volume 10 (2018)

Volume 9 (2017)

Volume 8 (2016)

Volume 7 (2015)

Volume 6 (2014)

Volume 5 (2013)

Volume 4 (2012)

Volume 3 (2011)

Volume 1 (2010)

Author = Sa’adollah Homaiuni

Criticue: The Pluralism and Dialect of Authenticity and Modernity in Arab Thought

Abstract

Contrastive Analysis – Semantics of Sentence System

Abstract

Cognitive and Metacognitive Factors in the Process of Learning Arabic Conversation through Desuggestopeida Method

Abstract