A Stylistic Study of the Discourse-Based Constituents in Amal Donqol’s Poem “A Special Interview with Noah’s Son”

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Arabic Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Identified as a social process, language is used for the creation of meaning and bears ideological connotations across its different layers, while it is employed through interactions with power relations. Poetic language serves as a fertile ground for linguistic and stylistic analyses. Given that stylistics is the study of methods with which meaning is created in literature and other texts through language, studying the function of linguistic patterns is an efficient method for stylistic analysis. Based on critical discourse analysis, discourse semiology, and functional linguistics, this study undertakes the stylistic analysis of Amal Donqol’s “A Special Interview with Noah’s Son.” It argues that the poet has taken up poetic discourse as a social weapon, has selected microlayers of “lexicon,” “syntax,” and “rhetoric” in association with the macrolayers of “ideology,” “power,” and “situational context,” and has personified the infrastructures, in order to tackle the political-economic crisis resulting from the Camp David Accords. The stylistic indicators of his poetry (diction, marked syntactical structures, and rhetorical figures) are discourse-oriented structures that bear ideological content, and according to power relations, lead to the highlighting of the discourse of the friend and the marginalization of that of the foe. Donqol’s attitude towards sociopolitical issues of his country is reflected in his stylistic features, such as choice of words as social signifiers, social indexing, modality in syntactic structures, grammatical voice of the text, along with rhetorical figures such as metaphor, allegory, symbolism, derision and repetition. And these are utilized to express the ideology of resistance against enemies and rejection of the current situation of Egypt and fighting against the policies of the then ruler, Anwar Sadat. Accordingly, this poem is a sociopolitical reading; its poetic language serves as a social action, and its text both makes and is made of social relationships, wherein the poet, considering his own ideology and that of the ruling power, portrays his beliefs by selecting different styles of expression.

Keywords

References

Abdulmutallab, M. (1988). Building Style in the Poetry of Modernity. Cairo: Egyptian Theology. [In Arabic].
Aghagolzadeh, F. (2013). Descriptive Dictionary of Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics. Tehran: Elmi. [In Persian].
Ayashi, M. (2002). Stylistics and Discourse Analysis. Syria: The Cultural News Center. [In Arabic].
Chevalier, J., & Gheerbrant, A. (2008). The Dictionary of Symbols (Vol. 4). (S. Fazaili, Trans.) Tehran: Jeyhun. [In Persian].
Donqol, A. (1987). Complete Poetry (3rd ed.). (Introduction by Abdul Aziz Maqaleh) Cairo: Madbouli Library. ]In Arabic.[
Fairclough, N. (2008). Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Office of Media Studies and Development. [In Persian].
Fotouhi, M. (2013). Stylistics (Theories, Approaches and Methods) (2nd ed.). Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian].
Ghahremani, M. (2014). Translation and Critical Analysis of Discourse: A Semiotic Approach. Tehran: Alam. [In Persian].
Al-Ghalaini, M. (2006). Jami al-Durus al-Arabiyah, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. [In Arabic].
Homayi, J. (1999). Rhetoric Techniques and Literary Devices (5th ed.). Tehran: Homa. [In Persian].
Jabr, M. A. (1988). The Principles of Syntax. Alexandria: Dar al-Awda. ]In Arabic.[
J. N, Jaj, A. (2015). Metaphorical Language and Conceptual Metaphors. Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian].
Kovecses, Z. (2014). A Practical Introduction to Metaphor. (S. Ebrahim, Trans.) Tehran: Samt. [In Persian].
Makaryk, R. (2009). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theories (3rd ed.). (M. Mohajer, & M. Nabavi, Trans.) Tehran: Agah. [In Persian].
Maslouh, S. (1992). Principles of Computational Linguistics (3rd ed.). Cairo: Book Science. [In Arabic].
Nørgaard, N. (2015). Dictionary of Stylistics. (A. Rezaei, & M. Farahmand, Trans.) Tehran: Morvarid. [In Persian].
Rababa, M. S. (2003). Stylistic Concepts and Manifestations. Jordan: Al-Kindy House for Publishing and Distribution. [In Arabic].
Rouini, A. (1992). Al-Janoubi. Cairo: Darsad Sabah. [In Arabic].
Soltani, A. (2008). The Power of Discourse, Language (2nd ed.). Tehran: Ney. [In Persian].
Taha, N. M. A. (1978). Irony in Arabic Literature until the End of the Fourth Century AH. Cairo: Dar Al-Tawfiqiya. [In Arabic].
van Dijk. T. (2010). Studies in Discourse Analysis: From Text Grammar to Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran, Office of Media Studies and Development. [In Persian].
ــــــــــــــ (2014). Ideology and Discourse. (F. Heidari, Trans.) Mashhad: Sokhan Gostar. [In Persian].
Yar Mohammadi, L. (2004). Common and Critical Discourse. Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian].
Arabic Literature
Volume 12, Issue 4
Winter 2021
Pages 19-38

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics