Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Graduate of Arabic Language and Literature, University of Tehran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, University of Tehran

Abstract

The present article seeks to analyze the contents of an Arabic newspaper based on the linguistic principles of text and discourse. The importance and necessity of this work is that it explains and reveals the linguistic techniques that journalists use to engage in media warfare against a country. Since Iran is a regional power in the Middle East, the newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat was selected from a country with an opposing discourse, namely Saudi Arabia, to show the various forms of use of ideology in the press. Asharq Al-Awsat has the important feature (important to this study) of writing ideological news against Iran. So the texts studied in this article are deliberately selected from a newspaper whose hostility to Iran is clear, despite claims of neutrality. The reason for this choice is to be able to perform a precise analysis of a discourse against Iran. The purpose of the article is to analyze the semantic discourse constructs of Asharq Al-Awsat with the aim of explaining the representational patterns in it. To do so, the critical discourse analysis model of Theo Van Leeuwen is used, which discusses representation in political texts, and the selected texts are examined qualitatively. According to Van Leeuwen’s theories — according to, for instance, what he calls role allocation — several factors show the ideological interferences of the authors with the discourse structures of the text. In many case, this newspaper, through various textual and linguistic strategies such as identification and classification, represents Iran as an influential actor with negative performance. In all such cases, on the contrary, the authors have represented Saudi Arabia positively. Thus, the article argues that the primary strategy of the text on which its structural discourses are based is to portray the negative and interfering role of Iran in opposition to the positive activism of Saudi Arabia.

Keywords

Aghagolzadeh, F., Asadi, M., Golfam, A., & Afrashi, A. (2015). Linguistic and Sociological-Semantic Components and Representation of Social Activists in Press Texts. Linguistic Research, No. 23, 1-24. [In Persian].
Ghiasian, M. S. (2007). Representation of Islam in American and British Publications before and after 9/11 in the Context of Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian].
McDonnell, Diane (2001). Introduction to Discourse Theories. (H. A. Nozari, Trans.) Tehran: Farhang Goftman. [In Persian].
Mills, S. (2003). Discourse. (F. Mohammadi, Trans.) Tehran: Discourse Culture. [In Persian].
Mehdizadeh, S. M. (2010). Media Theories. Tehran: Hamshahri Publications. [In Persian].
Pooshaneh, A., & Babak Moin, M. (2013). Analysis of Critical Discourse in a Work by Ebrahim Golestan Using Sociological-Semantic Components of Dialogue-Based Discourse with Representation of Social Activists. Journal of Linguistic Research, No. 14, 1-26. [In Persian].
Saeidnia, N. & Asadi, M. (2014). Representation of Women in Sooshoon and Sang Sabour Novels from the Perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis. Collection of Articles of Allameh Tabatabai University, No. 331, 687-704. [In Persian].
van Dijk, T. (2001). Ideology and Discourse: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona.
ــــــــــــــ (2003). Studies in Discourse Analysis: From Textbook to Critical Discourse. Tehran: Center for Media Studies and Research. [In Persian].
Yarmohammadi, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis Using Sociological-Semantic Components of Dialogue with Consideration of Social Agents. Journal of Literature and Language, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, No. 15 and 16, 105-118. [In Persian].
ــــــــــــــ (2009). Representation of Social Activists in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict through Sociological-Semantic Diagnostic Structures. Proceedings of Allameh Tabatabai University, No. 6, 421-443. [In Persian].
ــــــــــــــ (2004). Common and Critical Discourse. Tehran: Hermes Publishing. [In Persian].
ــــــــــــــ (2014). Communication from the Perspective of Critical Discourse Studies, Tehran: Hams Publishing. [In Persian].
Al-Hamid, T. (3/8/2016). Aleppo and Al-Muzhalah International, As-Sharq Al-Awsat, No. 13763. [In Arabic].
Al-Dakhil, T. (9/3/2016), Assassination of Saudi Ambassadors, Al-Sharq Al-Awsat newspaper, No. 13790. [In Arabic].
Al-Dakhil, T. (9/6/2016). Hajj without Saudi Arabia ... Hajj without Iran, Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper, No. 13797. [In Arabic].
Al-Dosari, S. (9/7/2016). When the Militia Turns into an Army, As-Sharq Al-Awsat, No. 13767. [In Arabic].
Fahs, M. (21/9/2016). Iran and the Saudi solid confrontation, Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper, No. 13812. [In Arabic].
Rashid, A. (18/10/2016). Oman between the Gulf and Iran, Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper, No. 13839. [In Arabic].
Youssef Al-Essa, S. (21/10/2016). What after Editing Mosul? Al-Sharq Al-Awsat Newspaper, Issue No. 13842. [In Arabic].
Al-Husseini, H. (27/10/2016). Russia exploits the war in Syria to destabilize NATO, Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper, issue 13848. [In Arabic].
Qutaish, Nadim, M. (28/10/2016). Aoun is not a solution ... not a problem, Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper, No13849. [In Arabic].
Taheri, E. (28/10/2016). The Middle East between the New Ottomans and the New Safavids, As-Sharq Al-Awsat, No. 13849. [In Arabic].