Arabic Literature

A Critical Semiotic Analysis of Amal Donqol “Al-Asha al-Akhir” Based on the Textual and Metaphorical Method of Fairclough and the Method of Action Analysis of Theo van Leeuwen

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Alibagher Taheriniya 1
Ezzat Molla Ebrahimi 1
Hossein Elyasi 2

1 Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, University of Tehran

2 PhD Graduate of Arabic Language and Literature, University of Tehran

https://doi.org/10.22059/jalit.2019.242075.611788
Abstract
Semiotics which emerged in the early twentieth century by Saussure and Pierce is a science that examines linguistic signs. Semiotics is a broad and pervasive branch of divergent and convergent schools that analyzes the signs of semantic production. One of the most important branches of semiotics is social semiotics, which is based on the linguistic role of Michael Halliday and emphasizes the context of the text. The present study, which is written in an analytical descriptive manner, seeks to analyze the context of the poem “Al-Asha al-akhir” which is one of the most important poems of Amal Donqol, a contemporary Egyptian poet (1940-1983), based on the principles of social semiotics. The poem is the result of the years following the Six-Day War which was fought between Egypt, Jordan, and Syria in 1967. It depicts the turmoil and bitterness of the Arabs’ defeat and its consequences, as well as the corruption in the governments of Egypt and the other Arab countries. In this poem, the poet recounts the historical and mythological past and condemns the current situation in order to call for a change. With the aim of inducing his readers to act toward this change, the poet uses historical, religious, and mythological personalities in order to give a clear picture of his ideologies and of the situation in Egypt. The article argues that Amal Donqol, using his lingual strategies and influential power, creates an integrated critical discourse system against the domination of tyranny. He addresses social evils such as poverty, passivity, and the lack of freedom in the society, emphasizing the important role of the intellectuals in making changes in the structure of the society. In his discourse, along with the reflection of the unhealthy situation in Egypt and, in general, the Arab society, he always delegitimizes the ruling government.

Keywords

Amal Donqol
Al-Asha al-Akhir
Social semiotics
Critical semiotics
Farklaf
van Leeuwen
Abid, M. S. (2012). The Cosmic Space of Poetry from Formation to Pampering. Beirut: Dar al-Nineveh. [In Arabic].
Aghagolzadeh F., & Ghiasian, M. S. (2015). Dominant Approaches in Discourse Analysis. Journal of Language and Linguistics, Year 3. [In Persian].
Aghagolzadeh, F. (2006). Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian].
Alborzi, P. (2007). Fundamentals of Text Linguistics. Tehran: Amirkabir Publishing House. [In Persian].
Anari, E., & Farahani, S. (2015). Semantic Abandonment in the Poetry of Amal Denqal. Journal of Arabic Literature, Vol. 2, Year 7. [In Persian].
Ayashi, M. (2015). Stylistics and Analysis of Discourse. Damascus: Dar al-Ninewi. [In Arabic].
Al-Bahrawy, S. (2007). Poetry of Defeat and Resistance. Journal of Socialist Papers, No. 33. [In Arabic].
Bidida, R. (2011). Stylistic Structures in the Poem of Belqis by Nizar Qabbani, Batna, Hajj Lakhdar University, Algeria. [In Arabic].
Canadian, M. A. (2003). Symbol and Mask in Modern Arabic Poetry. Lebanon: The New House of Books. [In Arabic].
Chandler, D. (2008). Fundamentals of Sociology. (M. Parsa, Trans.) Tehran: Surah Mehr. [In Persian]
Donqol, A. (1987). Complete Poetic Works (3rd ed.). Cairo: Madbouly Library. [In Arabic].
Ghahremani, M. (2013). Critical Translation and Analysis of Discourse. Tehran: Publisher. [In Persian].
Al-Jabri, M. A. (2000). Intellectuals in the Arab Civilization. Beirut: Center for Studies of Islamic Unity. [In Arabic].
Jorgenson, M., & Phillips, L. (1395). Theory and Discourse Analysis Approach (6th ed.). (H. Jalili, Trans.) Tehran: Reed Publishing. [In Persian].
Khairabadi, R. (2016). Critical Discourse Analysis: How Iran was Named and Presented in the Times of the United States since the 1920s. Linguistic Research, Vol. 30. [In Persian]
Khalaf Kamel, E. (2003). Al-Tajjah al-Simiology and Criticism of Poetry. Dar Al-Farah for Publishing and Distribution. [In Arabic].
Al-Khalil, S. (2012). Relationships of Attendance and Absence in the Poetry of the Literary Text (2nd ed.). Damascus: Dar Al-Tamouz. [In Arabic].
Marie Deineh Sen, A. (2001). Introduction to Semiotics. (M. Ghahraman, Trans.) Abadan: Question Publishing. [In Persian]
Maroof, Y. (2008). Al-Arooz al-Arabi al-Basit. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
Morshed Mahmoud, V. (2017). Taboo and Power Formations in Adnan al-Sayegh’s Poetry. Damascus: Dar al-Tamouz. [In Arabic].
Mujahid, A. (1998). The Problems of Poetry. Cairo: The Egyptian General Book Authority. [In Arabic].
Al-Musawi, A. (1994). The Structures Significant in Amal Dongul’s Poetry. Damascus: Union of Arab Writers. [In Arabic].
Najafi Ayooki, A., Vakili, Z., Mirgalooyi Bayat, N. (2013). Semiology of “The Last Words of Spartacus”. Contemporary Arabic Literature Criticism, 3(4).
Othman Abbas, S. (2009). Artistic Construction Tools in Donqol’s Poetry. University of Khartoum. [In Arabic].
Qamiha, J. (1987). The Human Heritage in the Poetry of Amal Donqol. Egypt: Hajar Press. [In Arabic].
Rababaa, M. (2011). Semiotics Interpretation Mechanisms. Kuwait: Dar al-Afaq. [In Arabic].
Saadia, N. (2016). Model Text Strategy. Syria: Dar Al-Hawar Publishing and Distribution. [In Arabic]
Shafiee Kadkani, M. R. (2013). Poetry Music (14th ed.). Tehran: Agah Publishing. [In Persian].
Sheikh Faraj, H. (2013). The Title in Modern Iraqi Poetry (Semiotics). Beirut: The Insights Library. [In Arabic].
Shukri Hayas, K. (2015). The Autobiographical Poem: Text Structure and Formation of Discourse. Oman: Darghida. [In Arabic].
Tahrbashy, M. (2000). Text Tools.  The Union of Arab Writers. [In Arabic].
Arabic Literature
Volume 12, Issue 2
Summer 2020
Pages 1-22

  • Receive Date 19 September 2017
  • Revise Date 04 November 2017
  • Accept Date 09 November 2019

Home

Contact Us