Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor in Arabic Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University

2 PhD student in Arabic language and literature, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

The structuralism method, which is considered by Mahmoud Bostani as one of the methods of text analysis, analyzes a literary work based on eight literary elements: message, subject, semantic, formal, verbal, musical, literary and structure and by explaining the relationship between the aesthetic and semantic aspects of a literary work, examines and analyzes its general structure as a single body. Bostani's views on the structural method, which he explains and introduces in the two books "Al-Qawa'd al-Balaghah in the light of the Islamic method" and "Al-Balaghah al-Hadith in the light of the Islamic method", is a combination of traditionalism and modernism in the analysis of a literary work. This means that he tries to apply new literary perspectives in studying and analyzing the work based on its structure and texture, while adhering to traditional rhetoric. What we are looking for in this research is the study of the beauties and literary meanings of Nahj al-Burdeh's ode by Ahmad Shoghi based on Mahmoud Bostani's structuralism method and based on four elements: semantic, formal, musical and structure, in this regard, we found that in Nahj al-Burda's ode, among the mentioned elements, mystery and metaphor as two elements of formal elements, pun and balance as musical elements, in addition to aesthetic aspects, had a semantic function and played an effective role in inducing concepts and themes. In this regard, we found that in Nahj al-Barda's ode, among the mentioned elements, code and metaphor as two elements of formal elements and pun and balance as musical elements, in addition to the aesthetic aspect, also had a semantic function and played a role in inducing concepts and themes. They have been effective and the element of repetition and contrast as semantic elements, by creating an internal rhythm, have also strengthened the aesthetic aspect of the ode and based on the element of structure, we found that the themes and concepts of the ode with each other and with other verbal and musical elements and imagination have a reciprocal relationship. In other words, the elements of aesthetics and semantics in this ode are interrelated, which indicates that this ode has homogeneity and organism of the text and this has made it one of the best prophetic praises, not only in form and structure, but also in content.

Keywords

Abdulmutalleb. M. (2007), Arabic rhetoric, other readings, Cairo, Lunjman, second edition [In Arabic].Abdul Jawad I. R. (2003), Linguistic Music, Cairo, Zahra Al-Sharq School [In Arabic].
Ahmadi.B. (n d), Text structure  and  interpretation, Tehran, Markaz, Twelfth edition [In Persian]. 
Alavi Moghadam. M. (1945), Jelweh Jamal, Tehran, Quran Foundation [In Persian].
Al-Bashri.Sh.S (1987) Nahj al-Burdah, composed by Ahmad Shoghi with its description [In Arabic] .
Al-Fakhouri. H. (1433 A H), History of Arabic Literature Qom, zavi al-Qorba [In Arabic].
Al-Hashimi. A. (n d), The Jawaher Al-Balagha in Meanings, Expression, and Innovation, Recording, Verification, and Authentication: Yusuf Al-Samili, Beirut, Al-Maktabah Al-Asri,  [In Arabic].
Al- Malaeka. N. (1983), The Cases of Contemporary Poetry, Beirut, Dar Al-Alam for the Clans, Eighth edition [In Arabic].
Al-Khouli. A. (1961), Methods of Renewal in Syntax, Rhetoric, Interpretation and Literature,(n p) , Dar Al-Ma'rifah [In Arabic].
Al-Saedi. Sh. M. (2000), Dr. Mahmoud Bostani, Islamic thinker, (n p), Al-Moallef [In Arabic].
Al-Samarai. F. S. (2000), Meanings of Syntax, Volume 2, Jordan, Dar al-Fikr [In Arabic]. .
Amin Moghaddasi.A. (2004), Comparative Introduction to the Prophetic Praises of Shoghi and Bahar, Journal of the Faculty of  Literature University of Tehran, Arabic Language and Literature, Vol44 No. 2 , pp. 1-18 [In Persian].
Amini.Sh.M.H (1964) Dictionary of Men of Thought and Literature in Najaf during the general period, Najaf Al-Ashraf, Press of Literature [In Arabic].
Anis.I.(1984), Meaning of words, Egypt, Egyptian Anglican Library, fifth edition [In Arabic].
Atiq, A. A. (1985), Elam al-Bayyan, Beirut, Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya [In Arabic].
Azizi. M. R. and Kargar. H. (1398), The study and frequency of types of puns in the ode Nahj al-Burdeh and the narration of Hazrat Resalat, the fifth national conference on new research in the field of Iranian language and literature (with a participatory culture approach) [In Persian].
Bostani. M. (2015), New Rhetoric, translated by Mohammad Hassan Masoumi, Qom, Marina  [In Persian].
ــــــــــــــــ (1994) The rhetorical rules with Islamic method, Mashhad, Islamic Research Complex [In Arabic].
Dashti Neyshabouri. M. (2014), Aseman Medina A Comparative Description of Slave and Nahj al-Burdeh in Praise of the Holy Prophet of Islam, Mashhad, Astan Quds Razavi Research Foundation, Second Edition [In Persian].
Dastgheib. A. (1929), The Bright Shadow of Modern Persian Poetry, Tehran, Farhang, [In Persian].
Fazeli. M. (2003) Methods of expressing the Holy Quran, Mashhad, Ferdowsi University [In Persian].
Gheibi. A. and Sayadani. A. (2014), A Study of Intertextual Relations in the Ode to the Slave of Busiri and the Ode of Nahj al-Burdeh Ahmad Shoghi, Qom, National Conference on Intertextuality (Al-Tanas), Vol. 4, pp. 829-854[In Persian].
Goldman. L. (1991), Critique of Criticism, translated by Mohammad Taghi Ghiasi, Tehran, Bozorgmehr [In Persian].
Ghonaim Kamal. A. (1998), Elements of Innovation in the Poetry of Ahmad Matar, Cairo, Madbouli [In Arabic].
Hajizadeh. M. and Ahmadi. S. (2015), The Image of the Prophet in the Poems of Abdolrazaq Isfahani and Ahmad Shoghi, Meeting of the Association for the Promotion of Persian Language and Literature of Iran, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Volume 10, pp. 486-493 [In Persian].
Jorjani. A. I. M (n d),  Moajam Al-Taarifat, Research and Studies by Muhammad Siddiq Al-Manshawi, Cairo, Dar al-Fadhila [In Arabic].
Jorjani. A. Q (n d), Dalael Al-Ejaz, Description by Mahmoud Mohammad Shakir, (n p) Al-Khanji [In Arabic].
Masoumi. M. H. and Sharifi Tashnizi. F. (2017), Analysis of aesthetic and semantic elements in Surah Qareh based on the method of structuralism, Literary Aesthetics, Vol 8, no 31, pp. 95-115 [In Persian].
Pasandian.F.(2010), A Study of Rhetorical Effects (Expression and Innovation) in the Ode of Banat Soad for Ka'b Ibn Zahir, Burdeh for Bousiri and Nahj al-Burdeh for Ahmad Shoghi, M.Sc., Supervisor: Mahmoud Abdanan Mehdizadeh, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies [In Persian].
Sadeghi. M. R. (2010) Translation of the poem Nahj al-Burda and the companion of the prophet Ahmad Shoghi and the expression of some syntactic and rhetorical points, M.Sc., Supervisor: Abolfazl Rezaei, Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Literature and Humanities  [In Persian].
Sarbaz. H. (2002) Review and Critique of the Prophetic Praises of Ahmad Shoghi, M.Sc., Supervisor: Khalil Parvini, Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. [In Persian].
Shafiee Kadkani. M. R. (2005), Poetry Music Tehran, Agah, eighth edition [In Persian].
Shar Shar. M. H. (1988), The Audio Construction in the Quranic Expression, Cairo, Al-Muhammadiyya Printing House  [In Arabic].
Shoghi. A.  (1988), Complete Poetry Works, Vol 1, Beirut, Dar Al-Ouda [In Arabic].
Taftazani.S.M. (2013), Al-Motavval Sharh Talkhis Meftah Al-Ulum,  Research: Abdul Hamid Hindawi, Beirut, Dar Al-Kitab Al-Alamiya, Third Edition [In Arabic].
Tajlil.J. (1988), Punishment in Persian Literature, Tehran, Cultural Studies and Research [In Persian].
Webster. R. (2003), An Introduction to the Study of Literary Theory, translated by Elahe Dehnavi, Tehran, Rooznegar [In Persian].
Zarkashi. B. M. (1430 A H), Al-Burhan Fi Uloom Al-Quran, Vol 2, Beirut, Dar Al-Fikr  [In Arabic].
zeif. Sh. (n d), rhetoric, evolution and history, Cairo, Dar al-Ma'arif, development [In Arabic].