Arabic Literature

Discourse Analysis of the Tenth Letter of Nahj al-Balagha Based on Norman Fairclough’s Pattern

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abdolhossein Zokaei 1
Roohollah Sayadinejad 2
Abbas Eghbali 2

1 PhD Graduate of Arabic Language and Literature, University of Kashan

2 Associate Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, University of Kashan

https://doi.org/10.22059/jalit.2019.257787.611906
Abstract
Critical discourse analysis, as a modern interdisciplinary approach, attempts to read the text beyond words, sentences, and the text itself. It deems the context necessary to understand the semantics of a text from a critical point of view. Its aim is to clarify the structures of power, domination, and political, social, and cultural inequalities. These structures are criticized through rhetoric, syntax, pragmatics, and intertextuality. This paper adopts a descriptive-analytical method to examine the tenth letter of Nahj al-Balagha,which is addressed to Muawiyah, based on Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse pattern. This model, theorized in the book Language and Power, redefines asymmetrical social relations. It considers three layers for discourse analysis: description, interpretation, and explanation. In Fairclough’s opinion, the social action is shaped by the interaction of these layers. This essay, on the layer of description, studies the text from a formalistic point of view. On the layer of interpretation, it deals with the interaction of text and its context, and explores the elements of power and ideology. It is noteworthy that these elements are reflected in the use of pronouns. The pronoun I, for instance, indicates professional and social responsibility while the pronoun you indicates the differences between Imam Ali’s personality and that of his counterparts, namely the Umayyads. The letter mentions the same motives that troubled the Islamic society from the first battle to the Battle of Siffin. Critical discourse analysis reveals the ideological differences between Imam Ali and the Umayyads reflected in its use of elements such as metaphors and pronouns. Furthermore, the article tries to demonstrate that in this letter, the purpose of Imam Ali as the religious and legitimate ruler of the Islamic world was to disrupt the domination and inequality in the structure of tribalism of the Umayyad Caliphate, for otherwise Muslims would face grave difficulties.

Keywords

Imam Ali
Nahj al-Balagha
Critical discourse analysis
Norman Fairclough
Metaphor
The Quran.
Abbas, H. (1998). Characteristics of Arabic Letters and Their Meanings. Arab Book Union. [In Arabic].
Abdollahi, M. A. (2005). The Theory of Verbal Speaking. Philosophical Theological  Research, 6(4), 91-119. [In Persian].
Ali ibn Abi Taleb (2004). Nahj al-Balagha (4th ed.). Egypt: Darolketab, & Lebanon: Darolketab. [In Arabic].
Allen, W. (2006). Australian Political Discourse: Pronominal Choice in Campaign Speeches. The 2006 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society.
Al-Amari, H. (2010) Discourse in Nahjul Balaqah. Beirut: Dar al-Kotb al-Elmia. [In Arabic].
Baldick, C. (2004). The Concise Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford University Press.
Bull, P., & Fetzer, A. (2006). Who Are We and Who Are You? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews. Text & Talk, 26(1), 3-37.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, N. (1989).  Language and Power. New York: Longman Inc.
Al-Faki, I. M. (2014). Political Speeches of Some African Leaders from Linguistic Perspective (1981-2013). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(3), 180-198.
Fazeli, F., & Soltani, B. (2015). A Persuasive Model of Metaphor in Socio-Political Discourse; Changing, Inculcating and Consolidating Socio-Political Attitudes. Literary Criticism, 8(31), 91-114. [In Persian].
Haliiday, M., & Hassan, R. (2014). Language, Context and Text (Dimensions of Language in Terms of Social Semiotics). (M. Nobakht, Trans.) Tehran: Siahrood. [In Persian].
Hosseini, M., Sassani, F., & Nazar Donyavi, S. (2016). Analysis of Social Semiotics of The Glass Agency’s Screenplay. Language Studies, 8(18), 61-84, [in Persian].
Ibn abi al-Hadid (1997). Explanation of Nahj al-Balaghah (2nd ed.). (Research by Mohammad Abolfazl Ebrahim) Qom: Ayatollah al-Marashi al-Najafi Press. [In Arabic].
Kalantari, A. H. (2012). Discourse from Linguistic, Philosophical and Sociological Perspectives. Tehran: Jameshenasan. [In Persian].
Malmir, M. (2010) A Study and Analysis of the Discourse of Dialogues in Nahj al-Balagha Letters. Bu-Ali Sina University. [In Persian].
Mohseni, A. A., & Parvin, N. (2015). A Study of Critical Discourse in Nahjal Balagha Based on Norman Fairclough’s Theory (Case Study of Kufian Description).Alavi Research Journal, 6(12), 133-155. [In Persian].
Al-Mofid (2008). Guidance in Knowledge of the Arguments of God for the Worshipers (2nd ed.). Beirut: Ahl al-Bait Heritage Foundation. [In Arabic].
Nemati, M. (2015). Analysis of Critical Discourse Translation of the Letter of Imam Ali to Malek Ashtar. Faculty of Literature and Humanities. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [In Persian].
Proctor, K., & Su, I. W. (2011). The 1st Person Plural in Political Discourse: American Politicians in Interviews and in a Debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3251–3266.
Rezapur. E., & Aghagolzadeh, F. (2012). The Role of Metaphor in Highlighting and Marginalization Ideology in Internal Newspapers. Language Studies, 4(7), 67-94. [In Persian].
Safaei, A., & Soltani, B. (2016). Analysis of the Critical Discourse of Imam Ali’s Letter to Muawiyah. Linguistic Queries, 7(7) (successive 35), 23-49. [In Persian].
Seyyedi, S. H. (2000). The Dimensions of Molla Ali’s Discourse in Nahj al-Balaghah. Journal of Faculty of Literature and Humanities (Ferdowsi University), No. 3-4, 629-642. [In Persian].
van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Political Discourse and Ideology. In Clara Ubaldina Lorda & Montserrat Ribas (Eds.), Anàlisi del discurs politic (pp. 15-34). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Yarmohammadi, L. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse (2nd ed.). Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian].
Arabic Literature
Volume 12, Issue 2
Summer 2020
Pages 63-83

  • Receive Date 16 June 2018
  • Revise Date 23 December 2018
  • Accept Date 30 April 2019

Home

Contact Us