Arabic Literature

Secondary Semiotics of the Myths of Naguib Mahfouz’s The Search

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Naimeh Ghaffarpoor 1
Vahid Mobarak 2
Mohammad Irani 3

1 PhD Student of Persian Language and Literature, Razi University

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Razi University

3 Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Razi University

https://doi.org/10.22059/jalit.2019.281647.612074
Abstract
Nowadays, the literary genre of fiction has taken over the place of myth. Thus, novel, like myth, may have latent semantic layers and, sometimes, the main purpose of the author is to convey these layers to the reader. Semiotics is a science that examines signs to receive the inner meaning of the text. The sign consists of the signifier and the signified and their relation is called signification. There are two types of signification, explicit and implicit. Examining the significations leads us to a variety of meanings that are not seen at the narrative level. These meanings can be reexamined with the method of secondary semiotics that Roland Barthes uses in examining mythical systems. In this method, the signs derived from the preliminary semiotics are reduced to signifiers and again go through a semiotic study. Every text or system that can be studied by secondary semiotics is called myth, as Barthes put it. Accordingly, this article, first, attempts to examine the mythical system of Naguib Mahfouz’s novel The Search by extracting the signs that have the capacity of being studied by secondary semiotics. Through preliminary semiotics, we come to its three central signs (or its three myths): search for Father, love, and wandering. These are the most important concepts in the novel, leading the narrative to the struggle between good and evil and the confusion of man about this struggle. Next, in order to discover the hidden semantic layers and the implied meanings of the novel, the three signs are reduced to signifiers and again go through a semiotic study. The attempt to find the signified for these three signifiers leads us to a variety of concepts which Barth calls myth. These concepts open new avenues of text and connect the reader to underlying semantic worlds not seen in the narration.

Keywords

Secondary semiotics
Myth
The Search
Naguib Mahfouz
Afzali, Z., Mirzaee, F., & Jafarzade, J. (2015). Methods of Representation of Thoughts in the Novel The Search. Iranian Forum of Arabic Language and Literature, 37, 1-20.
Ahmadi, B. (2010). The Structure and Interpretation of Text (10th ed.). Tehran: Markaz.
Alqamah, E. (1988). A Psychological Study on the Novel The Search. Howliat Kolliat Adab, 17, 29-52.
Armstrong, J. (2015). Conditions of Love. Tehran: Qoqnoos.
Asghari, J. (2006). Symbol in Literary Works of Naguib Mahfouz. Arabic Language and Literature, 1(3), 5-18.
Barthes, R. (2001). Mythologies. (Y. Abazari, Trans.) Arqanoon, 18,
85-135.
ــــــــــــــ (2013). Mythologies. (S. Daqiqian, Trans.) Tehran: Markaz.
ــــــــــــــ (2017). Elements of Semiology. In Semiology. (A. Nojoumian, Trans.) Tehran: Morvarid.
Fromm, E. (2014). The Art of Loving. (P. Soltani, Trans.) Tehran: Morvarid.
Guiraud, P. (2014). Semiology. (M. Nabavi, Trans.) Tehran: Agah.
Hanna, T. (1964). The Novel The Search by Naguib Mahfouz. Alqessa, 12, 127- 136.
Hinnells, J. (2015). Mithraism in the Ancient World (1st ed.). (M Saghebfar, Trans.) Tehran: Toos.
Jung, C. G. (2012). Four Archetypes (3rd ed.). (P. Faramarzi, Trans.) Mashhad: Beh Nashr.
Kazazi, M. J. (2006). Water and Mirror (1st ed.). Tabriz: Aydin.
Leach, E. (1979). Levi Strauss. (H. Enaiat, Trans.) Tehran: Kharazmi.
Mahfouz, N. (2014). The Search. (M. R. Marashipoor, Trans.) Tehran, Hashemi.
Makaryk, I. R. (2014). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory. (M. Mohajer, & M. Nabavi, Trans.) Tehran: Agah.
Meghdadi, B. (2006). Oedipus Complex in The Blind Owl and Three Drops of Blood. Samarghand, 11 & 12, 128-147.
Moein, M. (n.d.). Collections of Essays by Dr. Moein. Tehran: Bita.
Mokhtarian, B. (2009). Gav Bar Mayeh, Gorz Gav Sar va Mahpishani. Nameh Farhangestan, 10(2), 125-135.
Mosafa, A. (2003). Encyclopedia of Astrological Terms (1st ed.). Tehran: The Center of Human Science and Culture.
Parvini, K., Roshanfekr, K., Ganjian, A., & Amoori, N. (2011). Dialectic of the Search of God in The Search by Naguib Mahfouz. Lesaan Mobin, 5, 106-120.
Rougemont, D. (2014). Myths of Love. (J. Satari, Trans.) Tehran: Neshane,
Salem, G. (1972). The Search of Naguib Mahfouz. Almarefa, 126, 162-171.
Safavi, K. (2014). Semiology of Literature, Tehran: Elmi.
Sajadi, S. J. (2001). Encyclopedia of Mystical Terms (5th ed.). Tehran: Tahoori.
Satari, J. (2014). The Reflection of Myths in The Blind Owl (Oedipus or Electra?) (2nd ed.). Tehran: Toos.
Shafiei Kadkani, M. R. (2013). Resurrection of Words (1st ed.). Tehran: Sokhan.
Shayegan, D. (1998). Under the Skies of the World (2nd ed.). (N. Azima, Trans.) Tehran: Farzan Rooz.
ــــــــــــــ (2015). Cultural Schizophrenia (8th ed.). (F. Valyani, Trans.) Tehran: Farzan Rooz.
Sojoodi, F. (2014). Practical Semiology. Tehran: Elm.
Tahmasbi Omran, S. (2007). Translation and Criticism of the Novel The Search (Master’s thesis). Tehran University.
Ulansey, D. (2007). The Origins of the Mithraic Mysteries: Cosmology and Salvation in the Ancient World (2nd ed.). (M. Amini, Trans.) Tehran: Cheshmeh.
Vermaseren, M. J. (2015). Mithriaca (8th ed.). (B. Naderzad, Trans.) Tehran: Cheshmeh.
Wittgenstein, L. (2015). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1st ed.). (S. Dabagh, Trans.) Tehran: Hermes.

  • Receive Date 21 May 2019
  • Revise Date 11 December 2019
  • Accept Date 18 December 2019

Home

Contact Us