نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 طالبة الدکتوراه فی اللغة العربیة وآدابها، جامعة الإمام الخمینی الدولیة، قزوین، إیران.
2 أستاذ مشارک فی اللغة العربیة وآدابها، جامعة الإمام الخمینی الدولیة، قزوین، إیران.
3 أستاذ فی اللغة العربیة وآدابها، جامعة الإمام الخمینی الدولیة، قزوین، إیران.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Within contemporary discourse analysis, Teun A. van Dijk’s socio-cognitive model-particularly his formulation of Context Models-offers a rigorous explanatory framework for how discourse participants construct, interpret, and regulate meaning. By integrating episodic mental models with socially shared representations, this paradigm positions the literary author as an active, situated participant whose semantic memory structures textual production. While standard content-oriented analyses of Abdul Khaliq al-Rikabi’s novel Mā Lam Tamassahu al-Nār [Untouched by Fire] tend to confine their scope to thematic and aesthetic qualities, a critical discourse approach exposes the work’s structural dialectic with external realities and institutional power structures. Furthermore, examining the text through the author’s philosophical engagement with humanity and wisdom clarifies the specific discursive strategies whereby philosophical cognition materializes as narrative. Drawing upon philosophical knowledge as a foundational cognitive element of context, this study explores how Nietzsche’s conception of the Übermensch is operationalized through Van Dijk’s socio-cognitive heuristic. The investigation examines the interplay between textual micro-structures and societal macro-structures, using the cognitive interface as an explanatory bridge. At the micro-linguistic tier, the discourse mobilizes specific ideological square strategies, consistently attenuating the perceived deviance of the in-group (Nadeem and his companions) while accentuating the coercion of the out-group (Iskandar Bak). At the macro-structural level, the narrative interrogates authoritarian apparatuses in modern Iraq, anchoring the author’s stance in the novel’s opening philosophical thesis. Although framed superficially around an individual descent into psychological breakdown, critical analysis demonstrates that the novel operates as an exteriorized contextual mental model designed to challenge institutional hegemony and advocate an existential transvaluation of values-particularly conventional rationality-in response to Iraq’s modern socio-political crisis.
کلیدواژه‌ها English
